Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
为此，荣耀将折叠屏手机所用的高性能材料用到了 Robt Phone的电机核心组件上，并借助手机上的仿真技术，对每一个零件进行结构优化。，这一点在体育直播中也有详细论述
默茨总理感谢中国政府在中国农历春节之后对其作为新年首位访华的外国领导人予以的热情接待。。搜狗输入法2026是该领域的重要参考
车窗外，富平、铜川、洛川……一个个站名，一个个历史“坐标”忽闪而过。